Site Overlay

Agreements To Repay Your Employer For Training Costs

In Jeremy Sanders, Appellant, v. Future Com, LTD., an employer successfully obtained in a letter of offer earlier this year that the employee is required to reimburse the worker for training costs if he left the company within one year of completion of the training. The worker argued that the refund of the letter of offer was not part of his employment contract, but the court found that this was at least the case in Texas. It awarded $38,480.35 in damages to the employer and $34,000 in legal fees. Employers can recoup the money they invested in training an employee (for example. B send the employee to training sessions or workshops) if the worker decides to leave immediately after receiving training. It is not so unusual for employers to require workers to pay back their training or other wages that the employer incurred on its behalf when they leave their jobs. From time to time, an employee will argue that this type of clause is a punitive clause and therefore is not applicable. However, a clause is interpreted as a penalty only if: If you are looking for a model of a training agreement that you can use in your small business, simply click on this link. This model was designed by our professional, CIPD-qualified HR consultants who specialize in supporting small businesses and startups. The courts have also gone the other way.

In Los Angeles in 2015, a fourth district appeals court made an unpublished statement that former police officers who left the LAPD could not be forced to repay their training to the city. Because the city implemented a larger and more expensive training program than minimum certification, it became an employer-imposed burden that the city had to bear, not public servants, the panel concluded. The refund contract was found to be unenforceable. Not only would your company not be able to benefit from paid training in the short term, but it could also, in the end, pay again for the same training if it makes a replacement. Factor in the lower costs inherent in any recruitment process and you can see how this could possibly leave a small business in a really difficult position. For many companies that want to develop staff and skills in response to talent shortages, investment in learning can be considerable. What happens when a company invests in staff training, when it stops before the employer sees an advantage of training? Can companies recoup their investments? Let`s take a look at an example of training chords in action.




Scroll Up